Field Notes
How to Spot (and Shape) a Real Insight
So, what makes something an insight, not just a fact?
Here’s a quick test I use when pressure-testing research takeaways:
A true insight is...
💡 New: It offers a fresh angle or uncovers an unmet need.
💬 True: It resonates emotionally and behaviorally. You see it, feel it, nod.
🔍 Not obvious: If your client already knows it, it’s not news, it’s background. Keep going until you find something they don’t already know.
And most importantly: it can lead to action.
Here’s how to iterate your way there:
- Start with patterns.
What’s coming up in the data more than once? What’s unexpected?
Example: People in the South say X, but in the Northeast, it’s Y. That’s not the insight, but it’s where you start digging.
- Zoom in on tension.
Where’s the dissonance between what people say and what they do? What feels emotionally charged?
Example: Women say they prioritize rest, but their behaviors show they’re actually doubling down on output. That tension is a clue.
- Draft and test your takeaways.
Say them out loud. Do they hit? Do they make you feel something?
Try the “so what?” test:
“Parents are burned out.” So what?
“Fathers are opting out of being seen as needing help.” Now that’s an institutional design challenge.
- Sharpen with contrast.
Insights often appear at points of contrast:
South vs Northeast. Gen Z vs Boomers. Stated belief vs actual behavior.
Friction reveals the story.
- Keep editing.
Your first insight isn’t your best one. The magic usually lives in version 3 or 4. Don't put your digital pencil down until you've reached a true insight.
I keep coming back to this line:
“I would have written you a shorter letter, but I didn’t have the time.”
The hardest part of being an insights curator is knowing what to leave out. Distilling down to the few things that truly matter.
Pride can get in the way. There might be that urge to keep all of the cool things you learned from your study—don’t do it.
"Interesting" doesn’t move people... true, human, emotional clarity does.